PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PL vs. LEGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PL vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Labs PBC (PL) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 57.96% return, which is significantly higher than LEGR's 11.18% return.


PL

1D
-8.84%
1M
-25.16%
YTD
57.96%
6M
70.78%
1Y
480.07%
3Y*
106.65%
5Y*
25.63%
10Y*

LEGR

1D
0.92%
1M
4.00%
YTD
11.18%
6M
13.29%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PL vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PL
Planet Labs PBC
57.96%388.12%63.56%-43.22%-29.27%-37.24%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
11.18%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%6.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PL and LEGR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PL vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL
PL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PL vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLLEGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.34

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.79

2.64

+9.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.80

9.72

+27.08

PL vs. LEGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL Sharpe Ratio is 4.62, which is higher than the LEGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL and LEGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PL vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and LEGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLLEGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.73%

-36.12%

-49.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.23%

-10.40%

-29.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.17%

-14.25%

-40.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.73%

-31.45%

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.40%

-2.56%

-36.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.90%

-6.60%

-43.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.88%

2.82%

+10.06%

Volatility

PL vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison

Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 39.48% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 5.87%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLLEGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.48%

5.87%

+33.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.71%

12.07%

+66.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.61%

14.34%

+88.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.98%

17.07%

+63.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.91%

20.33%

+59.58%

Dividends

PL vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison

PL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.68%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PL and LEGR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PL has higher volatility (39.48%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.73% vs LEGR's -36.12%.

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PL and LEGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer