PKW vs. TMVE
PKW (Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - PKW tracks the NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PKW charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
PKW vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.
PKW
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PKW vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 3.81% | 4.38% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 17.39% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKW and TMVE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKW vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
PKW
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PKW vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKW | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKW vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKW | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.59% | -8.21% | -46.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.69% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -1.43% | -6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility
PKW vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKW | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 13.81% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 13.81% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 13.81% | +5.94% |
PKW vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKW vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.86% | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.72% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.30% | 0.65% | 1.59% | 1.14% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKW and TMVE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.
PKW has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for PKW and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer