PKW vs. QQQM
PKW (Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKW is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PKW returned 9.90%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKW charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PKW vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
PKW
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PKW vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 2.43% | 17.92% | 17.33% | 17.24% | -10.21% | 32.62% | 17.12% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKW and QQQM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PKW and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PKW vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKW
QQQM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
PKW
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PKW
QQQM
Industrials
PKW
QQQM
Technology
PKW
QQQM
Healthcare
PKW
QQQM
Energy
PKW
QQQM
Communication Services
PKW
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
PKW
QQQM
Utilities
PKW
QQQM
Basic Materials
PKW
QQQM
Real Estate
PKW
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKW vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PKW
QQQM
PKW vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PKW | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 2.65 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 3.46 | -1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.45 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.53 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 13.52 | -7.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PKW | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.65 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.82 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.85 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
PKW vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKW | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.59% | -35.04% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -11.96% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -22.70% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | -35.04% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -0.20% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -8.25% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.11% | -0.62% |
Volatility
PKW vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) is 3.18%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKW | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 4.48% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 12.05% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 15.91% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 22.24% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 22.12% | -2.34% |
PKW vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKW vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 0.90% | 0.99% | 0.86% | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.72% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.30% | 0.65% | 1.59% | 1.14% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKW and QQQM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PKW (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 9.90% for PKW. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.
PKW has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PKW is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKW and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer