PKB vs. PTF
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 15.78%/yr vs 26.39%/yr for PTF. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PKB vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 69.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 15.78%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 26.39% annualized return.
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
PTF
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 66.68%
- 1Y
- 95.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 26.39%
PKB vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 69.64% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and PTF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.67 |
The correlation between PKB and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
PKB vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
PTF
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Industrials
PKB
PTF
Basic Materials
PKB
PTF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
PTF
-
Utilities
PKB
PTF
-
Financial Services
PKB
PTF
Communication Services
PKB
-
PTF
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
PTF
-
Energy
PKB
-
PTF
Healthcare
PKB
-
PTF
-
Real Estate
PKB
-
PTF
-
Technology
PKB
-
PTF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
PTF
PKB vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 5.36 | -3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 20.45 | -13.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than PTF's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -55.38% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -17.99% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -36.11% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -44.88% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | -44.88% | -7.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -4.47% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -13.26% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 4.71% | +0.15% |
Volatility
PKB vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 8.73%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 16.30% | -7.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 31.97% | -13.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 40.36% | -16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.78% | 35.34% | -9.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 33.16% | -5.87% |
PKB vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PKB and PTF have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PKB vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and PTF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to PKB (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.39% vs 15.78% for PKB. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 8.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.39% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PKB and PTF have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PKB has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while PTF is Momentum. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer