PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKB vs. PSCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKB vs. PSCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than PSCM's 16.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed PSCM with an annualized return of 14.51%, while PSCM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.


PKB

1D
-1.73%
1M
-3.36%
6M
2.41%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
16.40%
10Y*
14.51%

PSCM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-9.52%
6M
6.49%
YTD
16.36%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. PSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
10.49%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%24.67%
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
16.36%15.59%0.67%19.86%-6.45%18.02%22.18%21.75%-23.28%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and PSCM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.65

The correlation between PKB and PSCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

PKB vs. PSCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKB
PSCM

Industrials

48.0%

-

Basic Materials

29.0%
91.6%

Consumer Cyclical

20.2%
1.8%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Energy

2.5%
6.4%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Industrials

PKB
48.0%
PSCM

-

Basic Materials

PKB
29.0%
PSCM
91.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PKB
20.2%
PSCM
1.8%

Utilities

PKB
2.8%
PSCM

-

Energy

PKB
2.5%
PSCM
6.4%

Financial Services

PKB
0.1%
PSCM
0.1%

Communication Services

PKB

-

PSCM

-

Consumer Defensive

PKB

-

PSCM

-

Healthcare

PKB

-

PSCM

-

Real Estate

PKB

-

PSCM

-

Technology

PKB

-

PSCM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKB vs. PSCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCM
PSCM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PSCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCM Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. PSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKBPSCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.18

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

7.41

-2.79

PKB vs. PSCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the PSCM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and PSCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKB vs. PSCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than PSCM's maximum drawdown of -51.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and PSCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBPSCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-51.34%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-14.33%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.75%

-35.36%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-35.36%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

-51.34%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.35%

-10.37%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-10.86%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

4.20%

+0.86%

Volatility

PKB vs. PSCM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) at 7.31%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBPSCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

7.31%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.37%

17.63%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.57%

24.07%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.90%

25.82%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

26.81%

+0.52%

PKB vs. PSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKB vs. PSCM - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than PSCM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.19%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
1.03%1.17%0.80%0.81%0.93%0.67%1.56%1.14%1.25%0.61%0.76%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKB and PSCM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKB has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to PSCM (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs PSCM's -51.34%.

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 14.51% vs 10.97% for PSCM. On fees, PSCM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCM has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 14.51% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

PSCM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.19% for PKB.

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while PSCM is Materials. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.29% for PSCM.

PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKB and PSCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer