PJUL vs. USMV
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUL returned 10.49%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for USMV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
PJUL vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 2.65% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
USMV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
PJUL vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 12.47% | -4.45% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.65% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | -4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and USMV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PJUL and USMV has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PJUL vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUL
USMV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PJUL
USMV
Financial Services
PJUL
USMV
Communication Services
PJUL
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
PJUL
USMV
Healthcare
PJUL
USMV
Industrials
PJUL
USMV
Consumer Defensive
PJUL
USMV
Energy
PJUL
USMV
Utilities
PJUL
USMV
Real Estate
PJUL
USMV
Basic Materials
PJUL
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
USMV
PJUL vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.09 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 0.68 | +3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.24 | 2.27 | +20.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 0.52 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.61 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.87 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -33.10% | +14.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -6.46% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | -9.36% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -17.93% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.18% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -2.88% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.93% | -1.27% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.42%, while iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 2.38% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 5.91% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 8.50% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 12.35% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 14.51% | -4.48% |
PJUL vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJUL vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
PJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUL and USMV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMV has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 7.45% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUL.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for PJUL.
PJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.15% for USMV.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer