PJUL vs. NVDO
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PJUL is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
PJUL vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 16.94%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 31.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 3.62% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 21.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and NVDO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
NVDO
PJUL vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.45 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -16.25% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -5.00% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility
PJUL vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 31.88% | -26.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 31.88% | -23.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 31.88% | -21.85% |
PJUL vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJUL vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
PJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.67% | 16.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUL and NVDO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUL.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 0.00% for PJUL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer