PJUL vs. BJUL
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and BJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PJUL tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July while BJUL tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUL returned 10.46%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for BJUL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PJUL vs. BJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than BJUL's 6.34% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
BJUL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 6.34%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. BJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 12.47% | -6.32% |
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 6.34% | 13.93% | 18.41% | 21.73% | -7.38% | 10.77% | 9.05% | 17.81% | -8.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and BJUL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PJUL and BJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJUL vs. BJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUL
BJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PJUL
BJUL
Financial Services
PJUL
BJUL
Communication Services
PJUL
BJUL
Consumer Cyclical
PJUL
BJUL
Healthcare
PJUL
BJUL
Industrials
PJUL
BJUL
Consumer Defensive
PJUL
BJUL
Energy
PJUL
BJUL
Utilities
PJUL
BJUL
Real Estate
PJUL
BJUL
Basic Materials
PJUL
BJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. BJUL — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
BJUL
PJUL vs. BJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.50 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 3.53 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.29 | 18.31 | +4.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.51 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.99 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.74 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. BJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum BJUL drawdown of -24.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and BJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -24.03% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -5.40% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | -14.06% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -14.06% | +3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -2.49% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.04% | -0.38% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. BJUL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.43%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 0.67% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.88% | 5.50% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 7.58% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 11.61% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 13.64% | -3.62% |
PJUL vs. BJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PJUL and BJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PJUL vs. BJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither PJUL nor BJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PJUL and BJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BJUL has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to PJUL (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs BJUL's -24.03%.
On 5-year performance, BJUL leads with 11.49% vs 10.46% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BJUL has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJUL and BJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PJUL and BJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while BJUL tracks S&P 500.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and BJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer