PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJP vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJP vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 6.15%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


PJP

1D
1.20%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.90%
6M
2.29%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
6.15%

PPA

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.54%
6M
13.46%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJP vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
2.90%27.98%9.63%-2.18%-2.16%14.58%11.29%4.64%-1.78%15.30%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.54%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PJP and PPA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between PJP and PPA has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PJP vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJP
PPA

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

90.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.8%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PJP
100.0%
PPA

-

Basic Materials

PJP

-

PPA

-

Communication Services

PJP

-

PPA
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PJP

-

PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

PJP

-

PPA

-

Energy

PJP

-

PPA

-

Financial Services

PJP

-

PPA

-

Industrials

PJP

-

PPA
90.1%

Real Estate

PJP

-

PPA

-

Technology

PJP

-

PPA
9.8%

Utilities

PJP

-

PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJP vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJP
PJP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJP vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJPPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.95

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

5.68

+5.86

PJP vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJP and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJPPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.40

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.97

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.84

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.66

-0.07

Drawdowns

PJP vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJPPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-57.37%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-13.71%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-15.24%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.51%

-18.37%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-43.92%

+9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-8.40%

+5.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-9.18%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.69%

-1.67%

Volatility

PJP vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.33%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJPPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

6.73%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

15.95%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

19.03%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.49%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

20.64%

-2.25%

PJP vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PJP and PPA have an expense ratio of 0.58%.


Dividends

PJP vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than PPA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.99%0.98%0.97%1.01%0.95%0.81%0.75%0.77%1.12%0.65%0.91%5.49%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJP and PPA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to PJP (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.38% vs 6.15% for PJP. Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJP and PPA have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.

PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index.

PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJP and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer