PJP vs. IDMO
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 7.24%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
PJP vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 7.24%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.
PJP
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 45.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
IDMO
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.23%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
PJP vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 15.15% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 7.56% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and IDMO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PJP and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PJP vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
IDMO
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PJP
IDMO
Financial Services
PJP
IDMO
Basic Materials
PJP
-
IDMO
Communication Services
PJP
-
IDMO
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
IDMO
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
IDMO
Energy
PJP
-
IDMO
Industrials
PJP
-
IDMO
Real Estate
PJP
-
IDMO
Technology
PJP
-
IDMO
Utilities
PJP
-
IDMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
IDMO
PJP vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJP | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 1.64 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 6.39 | +8.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJP vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -39.38% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -12.31% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -12.65% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -27.07% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -31.34% | -2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -4.56% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -9.70% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.14% | -0.12% |
Volatility
PJP vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) have volatilities of 5.91% and 5.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 5.90% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 16.88% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 18.54% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 18.13% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 17.89% | +0.49% |
PJP vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than IDMO's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.72% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.89% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and IDMO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJP has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to IDMO (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.40% vs 7.24% for PJP. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 7.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.89% for PJP.
PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.25% for IDMO.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer