PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJP vs. HIMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJP vs. HIMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJP vs. HIMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly higher than HIMZ's -71.55% return.


PJP

1D
3.04%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
12.79%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
6.42%

HIMZ

1D
21.95%
1M
69.46%
YTD
-71.55%
6M
-92.53%
1Y
-88.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJP vs. HIMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMZ's 1.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJP vs. HIMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJP
PJP Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMZ
HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJP vs. HIMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJPHIMZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

-0.43

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

0.02

+1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.00

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

-0.89

+2.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.03

-1.25

+6.28

PJP vs. HIMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the HIMZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJP and HIMZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJPHIMZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

-0.43

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

-0.44

+1.02

Correlation

The correlation between PJP and HIMZ is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PJP vs. HIMZ - Dividend Comparison

PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than HIMZ's 8.59% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.02%0.98%0.97%1.01%0.95%0.81%0.75%0.77%1.12%0.65%0.91%5.49%
HIMZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
8.59%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PJP vs. HIMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum HIMZ drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and HIMZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJPHIMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-98.18%

+61.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-98.18%

+86.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-96.91%

+91.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-64.39%

+55.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

70.45%

-65.57%

Volatility

PJP vs. HIMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 6.62%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a volatility of 79.45%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJPHIMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

79.45%

-72.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

127.80%

-116.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

203.42%

-184.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

203.86%

-187.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

203.86%

-185.44%