HIMZ vs. WDTE
HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIMZ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while WDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIMZ returned -79.25% vs 19.25% for WDTE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WDTE.
Performance
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -44.56% return, which is significantly lower than WDTE's 7.90% return.
HIMZ
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 78.12%
- YTD
- -44.56%
- 6M
- -52.24%
- 1Y
- -79.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | -44.56% | -69.65% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 7.90% | 16.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMZ and WDTE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025 | 0.42 |
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIMZ
WDTE
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
HIMZ
WDTE
Basic Materials
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Communication Services
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Consumer Cyclical
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Energy
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Financial Services
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Healthcare
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Industrials
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Real Estate
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Technology
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Utilities
HIMZ
-
WDTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMZ vs. WDTE — Risk / Return Rank
HIMZ
WDTE
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIMZ | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.34 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 2.53 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 11.66 | -12.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than WDTE's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and WDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMZ | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -15.85% | -82.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.18% | -7.65% | -89.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.98% | -2.94% | -91.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.79% | -1.83% | -67.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 74.50% | 1.65% | +72.85% |
Volatility
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a higher volatility of 46.42% compared to Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) at 4.44%. This indicates that HIMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMZ | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.42% | 4.44% | +41.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.27% | 9.31% | +126.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.06% | 10.97% | +184.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.31% | 11.51% | +188.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.31% | 11.51% | +188.80% |
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than WDTE's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMZ vs. WDTE - Dividend Comparison
HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than WDTE's 32.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | 4.41% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 32.96% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIMZ and WDTE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIMZ has higher volatility (46.42%) compared to WDTE (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs WDTE's -15.85%.
On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 19.25% vs -79.25% for HIMZ. On fees, WDTE is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 19.25% return vs -79.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDTE is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.
WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 32.96%, compared with 4.41% for HIMZ.
HIMZ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WDTE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 1.01% for WDTE.
WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMZ and WDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer