PJNQX vs. PRJZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PJNQX (PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6) and PRJZX (PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - PJNQX is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while PRJZX is a Global Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PJNQX returned 12.21%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for PRJZX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PJNQX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for PRJZX.

Performance

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) and PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJNQX achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than PRJZX's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PJNQX has underperformed PRJZX with an annualized return of 12.21%, while PRJZX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.17% annualized return.

PJNQX

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.26%
• 1Y: 62.52%
• 3Y*: 23.13%
• 5Y*: 17.11%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

PRJZX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 7.23%
• YTD: 9.40%
• 6M: 6.03%
• 1Y: 15.03%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 16.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PJNQX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6	26.16%	39.20%	1.23%	-1.78%	24.97%	27.84%	11.82%	17.07%	-27.53%	5.44%
PRJZX PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund	9.40%	4.91%	28.69%	41.55%	-39.60%	7.45%	74.45%	34.13%	-2.61%	43.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PJNQX and PRJZX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.48

Return for Risk

PJNQX vs. PRJZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJNQX

PJNQX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PJNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PJNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
PJNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PJNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PJNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PRJZX

PRJZX Risk / Return Rank: 9
PRJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PRJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PRJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PRJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PRJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) and PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJNQX	PRJZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	0.78	+2.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	1.19	+2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.15	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.78	0.71	+5.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.72	2.14	+19.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJNQX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the PRJZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJNQX and PRJZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJNQX	PRJZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09	0.78	+2.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.32	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.70	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.68	-0.51

Drawdowns

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJNQX drawdown since its inception was -74.06%, which is greater than PRJZX's maximum drawdown of -48.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJNQX and PRJZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJNQX	PRJZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.06%	-48.22%	-25.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-21.57%	+10.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.94%	-25.19%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.20%	-48.22%	+19.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.55%	-48.22%	-15.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	0.00%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.60%	-9.99%	-16.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	7.14%	-4.21%

Volatility

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) is 5.37%, while PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund (PRJZX) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that PJNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJNQX	PRJZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	7.02%	-1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.82%	16.14%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.74%	19.73%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.26%	23.87%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.42%	23.22%	+3.20%

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJNQX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PRJZX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJNQX vs. PRJZX - Dividend Comparison

PJNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than PRJZX's 22.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PJNQX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6	0.98%	1.24%	1.35%	2.27%	3.02%	1.22%	1.60%	2.14%	2.12%	0.00%	1.93%
PRJZX PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund	22.60%	24.73%	10.59%	0.00%	0.00%	10.12%	1.59%	2.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJNQX and PRJZX in my portfolio?

PJNQX and PRJZX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJNQX or PRJZX?

PRJZX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to PJNQX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJNQX dropped -74.06% vs PRJZX's -48.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.