PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJNQX vs. SDMZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJNQX achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than SDMZX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PJNQX has outperformed SDMZX with an annualized return of 12.21%, while SDMZX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.15% annualized return.


PJNQX

1D
2.06%
1M
2.99%
YTD
26.16%
6M
29.26%
1Y
62.52%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
17.11%
10Y*
12.21%

SDMZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.56%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJNQX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
26.16%39.20%1.23%-1.78%24.97%27.84%11.82%17.07%-27.53%5.44%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.15%6.18%5.64%6.25%-4.82%-0.19%3.97%7.92%0.95%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PJNQX and SDMZX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJNQX vs. SDMZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJNQX
PJNQX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PJNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SDMZX
SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJNQXSDMZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

1.66

+1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

2.81

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.54

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

3.58

+2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.72

14.98

+6.74

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJNQX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the SDMZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJNQX and SDMZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJNQXSDMZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.66

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.11

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.23

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

1.20

-1.04

Drawdowns

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJNQX drawdown since its inception was -74.06%, which is greater than SDMZX's maximum drawdown of -9.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJNQX and SDMZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJNQXSDMZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.06%

-9.76%

-64.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-1.44%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.94%

-1.44%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

-8.51%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.55%

-9.76%

-53.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.44%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

-0.99%

-25.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

0.34%

+2.59%

Volatility

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) at 2.46%. This indicates that PJNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJNQXSDMZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

2.46%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.82%

2.79%

+14.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

3.12%

+17.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.26%

2.55%

+22.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

2.58%

+23.84%

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJNQX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMZX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJNQX vs. SDMZX - Dividend Comparison

PJNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SDMZX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJNQX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
0.98%1.24%1.35%2.27%3.02%1.22%1.60%2.14%2.12%0.00%1.93%0.00%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
4.69%4.62%4.57%3.36%4.70%2.76%3.10%6.18%3.47%2.64%2.76%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJNQX and SDMZX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJNQX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to SDMZX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJNQX dropped -74.06% vs SDMZX's -9.76%.

PJNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJNQX and SDMZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer