PJFV vs. MDLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PJFV (PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF) and MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PJFV returned 24.56%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for MDLV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PJFV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MDLV.

Performance

PJFV vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFV achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than MDLV's 10.21% return.

PJFV

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 6M: 15.46%
• 1Y: 35.20%
• 3Y*: 24.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 11.06%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFV vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF	15.15%	18.65%	24.13%	18.68%
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	10.21%	13.30%	10.16%	0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFV and MDLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023	0.65

The correlation between PJFV and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

PJFV vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PJFV	MDLV
Industrials	20.6%	15.0%
Financial Services	16.9%	14.9%
Technology	15.7%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	3.9%
Energy	9.1%	14.4%
Healthcare	7.7%	7.9%
Utilities	7.6%	15.2%
Communication Services	7.1%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	8.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	2.6%
Real Estate	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

PJFV vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFV

PJFV Risk / Return Rank: 87
PJFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PJFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PJFV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PJFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PJFV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

MDLV

MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 75
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFV vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJFV	MDLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.29	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	3.35	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.39	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.83	4.70	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.72	14.78	+5.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJFV vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFV and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJFV	MDLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.29	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	1.06	+0.48

Drawdowns

PJFV vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFV drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFV and MDLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJFV	MDLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-10.71%	-7.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.31%	-4.27%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.15%	-10.71%	-7.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.08%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-2.29%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	1.36%	+0.34%

Volatility

PJFV vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) at 2.77%. This indicates that PJFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJFV	MDLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	2.77%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	6.57%	+3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	8.76%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.12%	10.52%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.12%	10.52%	+3.60%

PJFV vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJFV vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

PJFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than MDLV's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	2.80%	3.00%	2.78%	2.35%	0.00%
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF	0.59%	0.68%	1.31%	1.20%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJFV and MDLV in my portfolio?

PJFV and MDLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJFV or MDLV?

PJFV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to MDLV (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFV dropped -18.15% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

Which ETF is better, PJFV or MDLV?

On 3-year performance, PJFV leads with 24.56% vs 12.68% for MDLV. On fees, MDLV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PJFV or MDLV?

Over the 3-year period, PJFV has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJFV or MDLV?

MDLV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJFV or MDLV?

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.59% for PJFV.

What is the main difference between PJFV and MDLV?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PJFV and 0.58% for MDLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.