PJDZX vs. PDT
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT).
PJDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Mar 4, 2014. PDT is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 1989.
Performance
PJDZX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PJDZX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJDZX PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund | 0.63% | 18.84% | 40.98% | 8.67% | -10.35% | 24.62% | 13.96% | 32.01% | -7.14% | 17.53% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 5.12% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJDZX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than PDT's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PJDZX has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 13.73%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
PJDZX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 16.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
PDT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PJDZX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJDZX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PJDZX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
PJDZX
PDT
PJDZX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJDZX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.61 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 0.87 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.14 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.84 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 3.30 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJDZX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.61 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.33 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.28 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.32 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between PJDZX and PDT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PJDZX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
PJDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than PDT's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJDZX PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund | 6.39% | 6.44% | 34.62% | 1.21% | 0.93% | 8.48% | 4.75% | 4.32% | 10.34% | 1.83% | 1.48% | 1.31% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.56% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
PJDZX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJDZX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJDZX and PDT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJDZX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.59% | -62.39% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -10.34% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -40.44% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.59% | -62.39% | +28.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -2.93% | -3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -10.06% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.67% | -0.32% |
Volatility
PJDZX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) is 3.79%, while John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that PJDZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PJDZX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.21% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 7.16% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 13.21% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 17.06% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 25.18% | -7.91% |