PJDZX vs. AMINX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX).
PJDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Mar 4, 2014. AMINX is an actively managed fund by Amana. It was launched on Sep 25, 2013.
Performance
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJDZX PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund | 0.63% | 18.84% | 40.98% | 8.67% | -10.35% | 24.62% | 13.96% | 32.01% | -7.14% | 17.53% |
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class | -4.76% | 16.69% | 13.13% | 13.87% | -8.65% | 22.81% | 14.18% | 25.59% | -4.94% | 21.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJDZX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than AMINX's -4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PJDZX has outperformed AMINX with an annualized return of 13.73%, while AMINX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.
PJDZX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 16.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
AMINX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJDZX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AMINX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PJDZX vs. AMINX — Risk / Return Rank
PJDZX
AMINX
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJDZX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.28 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.06 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 4.31 | +2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJDZX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.65 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PJDZX and AMINX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Dividend Comparison
PJDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than AMINX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJDZX PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund | 6.39% | 6.44% | 34.62% | 1.21% | 0.93% | 8.48% | 4.75% | 4.32% | 10.34% | 1.83% | 1.48% | 1.31% |
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class | 6.09% | 5.80% | 6.06% | 5.61% | 8.61% | 5.02% | 6.91% | 8.22% | 6.87% | 6.04% | 4.58% | 7.18% |
Drawdowns
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJDZX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than AMINX's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJDZX and AMINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJDZX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.59% | -31.45% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -11.00% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -19.04% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.59% | -31.45% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -11.00% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -3.66% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.72% | -0.37% |
Volatility
PJDZX vs. AMINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) is 3.79%, while Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that PJDZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PJDZX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.57% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 9.23% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 15.68% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 13.75% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 15.86% | +1.41% |