PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJBF vs. PFRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJBF vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJBF achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly higher than PFRL's 1.96% return.


PJBF

1D
-1.20%
1M
4.04%
YTD
8.99%
6M
7.01%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFRL

1D
0.09%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.91%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
8.99%5.13%19.91%-0.80%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
1.96%6.25%9.40%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PJBF and PFRL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023

0.39

PJBF vs. PFRL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJBF
PFRL

Technology

40.3%

-

Industrials

18.0%
97.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Healthcare

11.2%

-

Communication Services

9.6%
88.1%

Financial Services

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

PJBF
40.3%
PFRL

-

Industrials

PJBF
18.0%
PFRL
97.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PJBF
13.6%
PFRL

-

Healthcare

PJBF
11.2%
PFRL

-

Communication Services

PJBF
9.6%
PFRL
88.1%

Financial Services

PJBF
2.8%
PFRL

-

Consumer Defensive

PJBF
2.3%
PFRL

-

Utilities

PJBF
2.3%
PFRL

-

Basic Materials

PJBF

-

PFRL

-

Energy

PJBF

-

PFRL
11.9%

Real Estate

PJBF

-

PFRL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJBF vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF
PJBF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PJBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJBF Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PJBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJBF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJBFPFRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.73

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

5.17

-4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

17.58

-14.68

PJBF vs. PFRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the PFRL Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJBF and PFRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJBFPFRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

3.35

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.67

-1.03

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than PFRL's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and PFRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJBFPFRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-8.83%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.41%

-1.25%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.03%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-0.44%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

0.37%

+5.37%

Volatility

PJBF vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) at 0.42%. This indicates that PJBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJBFPFRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

0.42%

+5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

1.58%

+14.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

1.94%

+17.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

4.86%

+16.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

4.86%

+16.66%

PJBF vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJBF vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison

PJBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than PFRL's 6.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
6.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
0.22%0.24%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJBF and PFRL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJBF has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PFRL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJBF dropped -25.67% vs PFRL's -8.83%.

On 1-year performance, PJBF leads with 16.62% vs 6.46% for PFRL. On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PFRL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PJBF has performed better with a 16.62% return vs 6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.

PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.22% for PJBF.

PJBF is categorized as Global Equities, while PFRL is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PJBF and 0.72% for PFRL.

PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJBF and PFRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer