PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. VAMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has outperformed VAMO with an annualized return of 10.75%, while VAMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


PIZ

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.00%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.89%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
10.75%

VAMO

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.15%
6M
4.57%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
16.21%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
3.15%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and VAMO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.37

PIZ vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIZ
VAMO

Industrials

49.9%
21.4%

Financial Services

28.1%
38.8%

Technology

10.9%
8.3%

Basic Materials

2.6%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
6.5%

Energy

2.0%
34.0%

Utilities

1.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
33.5%

Healthcare

1.1%
17.5%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Communication Services

-

5.0%

Industrials

PIZ
49.9%
VAMO
21.4%

Financial Services

PIZ
28.1%
VAMO
38.8%

Technology

PIZ
10.9%
VAMO
8.3%

Basic Materials

PIZ
2.6%
VAMO
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

PIZ
2.1%
VAMO
6.5%

Energy

PIZ
2.0%
VAMO
34.0%

Utilities

PIZ
1.6%
VAMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PIZ
1.6%
VAMO
33.5%

Healthcare

PIZ
1.1%
VAMO
17.5%

Real Estate

PIZ
0.5%
VAMO

-

Communication Services

PIZ

-

VAMO
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIZVAMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.28

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

9.47

-1.30

PIZ vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIZVAMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.63

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.31

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.24

+0.04

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than VAMO's maximum drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and VAMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZVAMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-41.84%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-5.55%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-11.61%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-17.25%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-41.84%

+0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-2.76%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-9.98%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.92%

+1.68%

Volatility

PIZ vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.97%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZVAMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

2.97%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

7.66%

+10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

11.19%

+9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

17.34%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

18.09%

+1.56%

PIZ vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than VAMO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.34%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.63%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and VAMO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

On 10-year performance, PIZ leads with 10.75% vs 5.64% for VAMO. On fees, VAMO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VAMO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.65% for VAMO.

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and VAMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer