PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 14.84% return.


PIZ

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.00%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.89%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
10.75%

ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
16.21%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%2.53%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and ULVM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.69

The correlation between PIZ and ULVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PIZ vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIZ
ULVM

Industrials

49.9%
12.2%

Financial Services

28.1%
22.5%

Technology

10.9%
13.1%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.7%

Energy

2.0%
3.4%

Utilities

1.6%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
5.3%

Healthcare

1.1%
10.1%

Real Estate

0.5%
8.7%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Industrials

PIZ
49.9%
ULVM
12.2%

Financial Services

PIZ
28.1%
ULVM
22.5%

Technology

PIZ
10.9%
ULVM
13.1%

Basic Materials

PIZ
2.6%
ULVM
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

PIZ
2.1%
ULVM
4.7%

Energy

PIZ
2.0%
ULVM
3.4%

Utilities

PIZ
1.6%
ULVM
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PIZ
1.6%
ULVM
5.3%

Healthcare

PIZ
1.1%
ULVM
10.1%

Real Estate

PIZ
0.5%
ULVM
8.7%

Communication Services

PIZ

-

ULVM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIZULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

4.50

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

18.64

-10.47

PIZ vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIZULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.71

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.58

-0.30

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-40.71%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-6.47%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-18.14%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-19.77%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-0.13%

-4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-5.75%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.56%

+2.04%

Volatility

PIZ vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

2.96%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

7.97%

+9.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

10.74%

+9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

15.48%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

18.86%

+0.79%

PIZ vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.34%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and ULVM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 10.38% for PIZ. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.34% for PIZ.

PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer