PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. DNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. DNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than DNL's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has outperformed DNL with an annualized return of 10.32%, while DNL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.


PIZ

1D
2.50%
1M
-7.55%
6M
4.73%
YTD
8.87%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
10.32%
ALL TIME*
5.74%

DNL

1D
1.75%
1M
-2.01%
6M
7.67%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
5.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. DNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
8.87%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.79%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%36.23%-14.76%31.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and DNL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2008

0.81

The correlation between PIZ and DNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIZ vs. DNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIZ
DNL

Industrials

46.9%
15.6%

Financial Services

27.8%
3.9%

Technology

15.7%
36.9%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
18.2%

Energy

1.5%
5.1%

Utilities

1.4%
0.5%

Healthcare

0.7%
10.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Industrials

PIZ
46.9%
DNL
15.6%

Financial Services

PIZ
27.8%
DNL
3.9%

Technology

PIZ
15.7%
DNL
36.9%

Basic Materials

PIZ
2.5%
DNL
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

PIZ
1.9%
DNL
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PIZ
1.7%
DNL
18.2%

Energy

PIZ
1.5%
DNL
5.1%

Utilities

PIZ
1.4%
DNL
0.5%

Healthcare

PIZ
0.7%
DNL
10.0%

Real Estate

PIZ
0.4%
DNL
0.0%

Communication Services

PIZ

-

DNL
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. DNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. DNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIZDNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

4.27

-0.68

PIZ vs. DNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the DNL Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and DNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. DNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than DNL's maximum drawdown of -44.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and DNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZDNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-44.53%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-12.42%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-20.15%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-34.85%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-34.85%

-6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-2.16%

-8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

-10.11%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

3.52%

+1.04%

Volatility

PIZ vs. DNL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) at 5.31%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZDNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

5.31%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.20%

16.34%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.24%

19.03%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

18.47%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

18.59%

+1.06%

PIZ vs. DNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DNL's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. DNL - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than DNL's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.31%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.58%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and DNL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to DNL (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs DNL's -44.53%.

On 10-year performance, PIZ leads with 10.32% vs 8.88% for DNL. On fees, DNL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DNL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.31% for DNL.

PIZ is categorized as Momentum, while DNL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.58% for DNL.

DNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and DNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer