PIT vs. CCOM
PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) and CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PIT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CCOM.
Performance
PIT vs. CCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PIT
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 21.39%
- YTD
- 34.35%
- 1Y
- 50.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.67%
CCOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $501.20 | $1.57K | $4.74K | |
| $1.27M | $2.71M | $3.77M |
PIT vs. CCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 19.83% |
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIT and CCOM is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIT vs. CCOM — Risk / Return Rank
PIT
CCOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PIT vs. CCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIT | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIT vs. CCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than CCOM's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and CCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIT | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -7.44% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.29% | -5.83% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -3.37% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility
PIT vs. CCOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIT | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 12.44% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 12.44% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 12.44% | +5.31% |
PIT vs. CCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIT vs. CCOM - Dividend Comparison
PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than CCOM's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.64% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIT and CCOM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 1.26% for CCOM.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PIT and 0.99% for CCOM.
Find the right allocation for PIT and CCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer