PIT vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PIT returned 24.30%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for BCI. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

PIT vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 41.36% return, which is significantly higher than BCI's 26.68% return.

PIT

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 41.36%
• 6M: 42.58%
• 1Y: 62.93%
• 3Y*: 24.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIT vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	41.36%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	2.74%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and BCI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2022	0.88

The correlation between PIT and BCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PIT vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 87
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIT	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	2.30	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	2.92	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.41	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.83	5.10	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.27	13.14	+10.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIT vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIT	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	2.30	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.48	+0.59

Drawdowns

PIT vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIT	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-32.69%	+20.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.27%	-7.61%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.27%	-11.38%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-4.52%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-12.00%	+8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	2.95%	-0.24%

Volatility

PIT vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 5.16%. This indicates that PIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIT	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	5.16%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.02%	14.80%	+4.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.30%	16.92%	+4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	16.82%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	15.65%	+1.82%

PIT vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIT vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than BCI's 13.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	6.31%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIT and BCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PIT and BCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PIT or BCI?

PIT has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to BCI (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIT dropped -12.27% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, PIT or BCI?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 24.30% vs 15.96% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PIT or BCI?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 15.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIT or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIT or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 6.31% for PIT.

What is the main difference between PIT and BCI?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PIT and 0.25% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.