PIRMX vs. BMAR
PIRMX (PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) and BMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) are both funds - PIRMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by PIMCO, while BMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index. PIRMX is actively managed, while BMAR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PIRMX returned 8.47%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for BMAR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIRMX charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BMAR.
Performance
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIRMX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than BMAR's 8.62% return.
PIRMX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 17.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
BMAR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- —
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 7.45% | 16.76% | 12.47% | 6.50% | -5.11% | 13.86% | 10.72% |
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 8.62% | 14.97% | 16.49% | 23.09% | -7.06% | 16.79% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIRMX and BMAR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIRMX vs. BMAR — Risk / Return Rank
PIRMX
BMAR
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (PIRMX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIRMX | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.58 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 3.73 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.22 | 20.88 | +1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIRMX | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 2.85 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIRMX drawdown since its inception was -18.51%, smaller than the maximum BMAR drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIRMX and BMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIRMX | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -21.43% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.37% | -5.64% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | -12.86% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | -15.02% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.26% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -2.34% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 1.01% | -0.20% |
Volatility
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (PIRMX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) at 1.45%. This indicates that PIRMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIRMX | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 1.45% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.69% | 5.88% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 7.39% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 11.32% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 13.67% | -6.19% |
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIRMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than BMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIRMX vs. BMAR - Dividend Comparison
PIRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 2.41% | 2.66% | 9.91% | 0.13% | 14.12% | 11.21% | 0.80% | 2.05% | 11.41% | 6.43% | 0.49% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIRMX and BMAR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIRMX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to BMAR (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIRMX dropped -18.51% vs BMAR's -21.43%.
PIRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIRMX and BMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer