PIPR vs. AGI
PIPR (Piper Sandler Companies) and AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. PIPR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, PIPR returned 24.78%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for AGI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PIPR vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPR achieves a -13.26% return, which is significantly higher than AGI's -23.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PIPR has outperformed AGI with an annualized return of 24.78%, while AGI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.40% annualized return.
PIPR
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- 6M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -13.26%
- 1Y
- -2.12%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- 24.78%
AGI
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -14.58%
- 6M
- -29.40%
- YTD
- -23.48%
- 1Y
- 11.05%
- 3Y*
- 35.85%
- 5Y*
- 31.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
PIPR vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | -13.26% | 15.52% | 74.24% | 37.78% | -23.41% | 85.33% | 29.64% | 23.88% | -20.69% | 21.22% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -23.48% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 68.42% | -44.49% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPR and AGI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004 | 0.09 |
The correlation between PIPR and AGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PIPR:
$4.87B
AGI:
$12.37B
PIPR:
$3.95
AGI:
$2.52
PIPR:
18.24
AGI:
11.71
PIPR:
1.21
AGI:
0.08
PIPR:
2.57
AGI:
6.02
PIPR:
3.83
AGI:
2.69
PIPR:
$2.00B
AGI:
$2.07B
PIPR:
$1.95B
AGI:
$1.22B
PIPR:
$455.82M
AGI:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPR vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
PIPR
AGI
PIPR vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIPR | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.09 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 0.28 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 0.74 | -0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIPR vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPR drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, smaller than the maximum AGI drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPR and AGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPR | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | -88.13% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.56% | -47.06% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.78% | -47.06% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.30% | -47.06% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.02% | -69.05% | +6.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.06% | -46.65% | +24.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.56% | -37.74% | +7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.45% | 17.85% | -6.40% |
Volatility
PIPR vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is 11.17%, while Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) has a volatility of 19.40%. This indicates that PIPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPR | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 19.40% | -8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.76% | 45.42% | -17.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.06% | 53.69% | -18.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 41.82% | -6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 48.53% | -11.99% |
Dividends
PIPR vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
PIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than AGI's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.44% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 2.74% | 1.68% | 1.17% | 2.09% | 5.30% | 3.81% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 4.74% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PIPR vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piper Sandler Companies and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PIPR vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
PIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a gross profit of 456.39M and revenue of 475.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 376.02M and revenue of 588.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
PIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported an operating income of 88.67M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 337.66M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
PIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a net income of 65.24M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.75M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPR and AGI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGI has higher volatility (19.40%) compared to PIPR (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPR dropped -76.97% vs AGI's -88.13%.
AGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPR and AGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer