PIPIX vs. PBCKX
PIPIX (Principal Inflation Protection Fund) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both mutual funds - PIPIX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Principal, while PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PIPIX returned 2.23%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for PBCKX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIPIX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.
Performance
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPIX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PIPIX has underperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.17% annualized return.
PIPIX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 3.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
PBCKX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- -0.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPIX Principal Inflation Protection Fund | 0.91% | 6.65% | 1.65% | 3.51% | -12.09% | 5.35% | 10.59% | 8.06% | -1.58% | 3.02% |
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | -1.15% | 9.20% | 26.90% | 40.58% | -30.74% | 25.05% | 34.77% | 45.22% | 2.83% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPIX and PBCKX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, PIPIX and PBCKX have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPIX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank
PIPIX
PBCKX
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Inflation Protection Fund (PIPIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIPIX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.07 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | -0.20 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPIX drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum PBCKX drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPIX and PBCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPIX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -38.00% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -19.10% | +17.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.70% | -19.10% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | -38.00% | +23.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.33% | -38.00% | +23.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -4.90% | +4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -5.66% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 6.67% | -6.00% |
Volatility
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Inflation Protection Fund (PIPIX) is 1.29%, while Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that PIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPIX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 5.20% | -3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 13.14% | -10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41% | 15.86% | -12.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 20.47% | -14.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 20.19% | -14.83% |
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIPIX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison
PIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than PBCKX's 20.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | 20.18% | 19.94% | 9.01% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 6.67% | 3.28% | 8.90% | 7.86% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 2.40% |
PIPIX Principal Inflation Protection Fund | 4.66% | 4.70% | 3.41% | 3.64% | 6.37% | 7.34% | 1.09% | 1.79% | 3.00% | 2.04% | 0.88% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPIX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBCKX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to PIPIX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPIX dropped -25.31% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.
PIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPIX and PBCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer