PIPIX vs. FSPWX
PIPIX (Principal Inflation Protection Fund) and FSPWX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past year, PIPIX returned 5.24% vs 5.38% for FSPWX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIPIX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FSPWX.
Performance
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPIX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than FSPWX's 1.83% return.
PIPIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
FSPWX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PIPIX Principal Inflation Protection Fund | 1.69% | 6.65% | -1.56% |
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 1.83% | 6.76% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPIX and FSPWX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PIPIX and FSPWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPIX vs. FSPWX — Risk / Return Rank
PIPIX
FSPWX
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Inflation Protection Fund (PIPIX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIPIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.67 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 8.19 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIPIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.00 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPIX drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than FSPWX's maximum drawdown of -3.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPIX and FSPWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -3.84% | -21.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -1.95% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -0.98% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
Volatility
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Inflation Protection Fund (PIPIX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.92% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 2.28% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 3.35% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 4.06% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 4.06% | +1.30% |
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPWX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIPIX vs. FSPWX - Dividend Comparison
PIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FSPWX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 4.19% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPIX Principal Inflation Protection Fund | 4.62% | 4.70% | 3.41% | 3.64% | 6.37% | 7.34% | 1.09% | 1.79% | 3.00% | 2.04% | 0.88% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PIPIX and FSPWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PIPIX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to FSPWX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPIX dropped -25.31% vs FSPWX's -3.84%.
FSPWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPIX and FSPWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer