PIPIX vs. FSTZX
PIPIX (Principal Inflation Protection Fund) and FSTZX (Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, PIPIX returned 3.78%/yr vs 5.30%/yr for FSTZX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIPIX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FSTZX.
Performance
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPIX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than FSTZX's 2.09% return.
PIPIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
FSTZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPIX Principal Inflation Protection Fund | 1.69% | 6.65% | 1.65% | 3.51% | -12.09% | 1.59% |
FSTZX Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 2.09% | 5.99% | 4.87% | 4.67% | -2.83% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPIX and FSTZX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PIPIX and FSTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPIX vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank
PIPIX
FSTZX
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Inflation Protection Fund (PIPIX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIPIX | FSTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.65 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 6.68 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 24.52 | -16.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIPIX | FSTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.86 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.20 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPIX drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than FSTZX's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPIX and FSTZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPIX | FSTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -5.30% | -20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -0.70% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.70% | -1.03% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -1.09% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 0.19% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Inflation Protection Fund (PIPIX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) at 0.51%. This indicates that PIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPIX | FSTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.51% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 1.09% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 1.64% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 2.79% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 2.79% | +2.57% |
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIPIX vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison
PIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FSTZX's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTZX Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 3.64% | 4.02% | 2.78% | 2.54% | 5.25% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPIX Principal Inflation Protection Fund | 4.62% | 4.70% | 3.41% | 3.64% | 6.37% | 7.34% | 1.09% | 1.79% | 3.00% | 2.04% | 0.88% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPIX and FSTZX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIPIX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to FSTZX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPIX dropped -25.31% vs FSTZX's -5.30%.
FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPIX and FSTZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer