PIPAX vs. BXSL
PIPAX (PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by PIMCO, while BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, PIPAX returned 16.11%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for BXSL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PIPAX vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPAX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.70% return.
PIPAX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
BXSL
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 6M
- -11.93%
- 1Y
- -17.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIPAX vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 9.45% | 16.57% | 14.37% | 21.29% | -9.30% | 1.54% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -8.70% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 24.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPAX and BXSL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPAX vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank
PIPAX
BXSL
PIPAX vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIPAX | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.87 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | -0.74 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | -1.13 | +7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIPAX | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | -0.87 | +2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.29 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
PIPAX vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPAX drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than BXSL's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPAX and BXSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPAX | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -36.80% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -23.47% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -24.21% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.50% | +22.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -14.12% | +6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 15.37% | -12.29% |
Volatility
PIPAX vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) is 3.68%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that PIPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPAX | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 5.04% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 16.24% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 19.90% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 23.73% | -9.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 23.73% | -9.07% |
Dividends
PIPAX vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison
PIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than BXSL's 13.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 13.24% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 5.13% | 5.61% | 12.69% | 10.56% | 10.66% | 7.59% | 1.44% | 11.71% | 8.25% | 7.38% | 0.78% | 8.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPAX and BXSL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXSL has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PIPAX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPAX dropped -57.80% vs BXSL's -36.80%.
PIPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPAX and BXSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer