PIPAX vs. FGSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX).
PIPAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003. FGSAX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Aug 23, 1984.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PIPAX or FGSAX.
Key characteristics
PIPAX | FGSAX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 12.44% | 37.53% |
1Y Return | 19.05% | 51.25% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.32% | -1.06% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.48% | 8.20% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 6.81% | 2.47% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 3.65 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.23 | 4.81 |
Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.66 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.80 | 1.53 |
Martin Ratio | 9.15 | 24.04 |
Ulcer Index | 2.19% | 2.32% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.39% | 15.30% |
Max Drawdown | -58.00% | -68.55% |
Current Drawdown | -3.29% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPAX and FGSAX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PIPAX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PIPAX achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than FGSAX's 37.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PIPAX has outperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 6.81%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PIPAX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PIPAX and FGSAX have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PIPAX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PIPAX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison
PIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%, while FGSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 13.78% | 9.88% | 5.75% | 7.60% | 1.44% | 9.01% | 1.46% | 7.39% | 0.79% | 8.15% | 12.09% | 5.75% |
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PIPAX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -68.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPAX and FGSAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PIPAX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) is 2.60%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that PIPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.