PINS vs. MRNA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PINS (Pinterest, Inc.) and MRNA (Moderna, Inc.) are both stocks. PINS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while MRNA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, PINS returned -21.59%/yr vs -25.59%/yr for MRNA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PINS vs. MRNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINS achieves a -21.94% return, which is significantly lower than MRNA's 69.24% return.

PINS

• 1D: -6.00%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: -21.94%
• 6M: -22.24%
• 1Y: -40.28%
• 3Y*: -5.89%
• 5Y*: -21.59%
• 10Y*: —

MRNA

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 69.24%
• 6M: 69.42%
• 1Y: 87.14%
• 3Y*: -26.94%
• 5Y*: -25.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINS vs. MRNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PINS Pinterest, Inc.	-21.94%	-10.72%	-21.71%	52.55%	-33.20%	-44.84%	253.54%	-21.52%
MRNA Moderna, Inc.	69.24%	-29.08%	-58.19%	-44.63%	-29.28%	143.11%	434.10%	-16.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PINS and MRNA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019	0.24

The correlation between PINS and MRNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PINS : $12.87B MRNA : $19.71B
EPS PINS : $0.50 MRNA : -$8.16
PS Ratio PINS : 3.12 MRNA : 8.78
PB Ratio PINS : 4.51 MRNA : 2.66
Total Revenue (TTM) PINS : $4.37B MRNA : $2.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) PINS : $3.49B MRNA : -$309.00M
EBITDA (TTM) PINS : $351.59M MRNA : -$3.02B

Return for Risk

PINS vs. MRNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINS

PINS Risk / Return Rank: 14
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

MRNA

MRNA Risk / Return Rank: 78
MRNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MRNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MRNA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MRNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MRNA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINS vs. MRNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PINS	MRNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	1.28	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	2.13	-3.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.24	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	2.34	-3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	4.59	-5.74

PINS vs. MRNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the MRNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINS and MRNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PINS vs. MRNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINS drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, smaller than the maximum MRNA drawdown of -95.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINS and MRNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINS	MRNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.70%	-95.38%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.63%	-35.51%	-25.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.72%	-86.58%	+20.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.79%	-95.38%	+14.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.33%	-89.70%	+12.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.34%	-57.06%	+4.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.29%	18.06%	+17.23%

Volatility

PINS vs. MRNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is 14.23%, while Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that PINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINS	MRNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.23%	17.56%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.04%	48.82%	-10.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.60%	64.75%	-15.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.83%	66.49%	-10.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.16%	72.15%	-10.99%

Dividends

PINS vs. MRNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither PINS nor MRNA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PINS and MRNA in my portfolio?

PINS and MRNA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PINS or MRNA?

MRNA has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to PINS (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINS dropped -82.70% vs MRNA's -95.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.