PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINS vs. MANU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PINS vs. MANU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Manchester United plc (MANU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINS achieves a -17.61% return, which is significantly lower than MANU's 46.36% return.


PINS

1D
5.54%
1M
9.55%
YTD
-17.61%
6M
-17.20%
1Y
-36.97%
3Y*
-5.61%
5Y*
-21.08%
10Y*

MANU

1D
0.39%
1M
21.16%
YTD
46.36%
6M
53.29%
1Y
35.07%
3Y*
-0.50%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINS vs. MANU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
-17.61%-10.72%-21.71%52.55%-33.20%-44.84%253.54%-21.52%
MANU
Manchester United plc
46.36%-8.24%-14.87%-12.64%65.01%-13.92%-15.08%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PINS and MANU is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PINS:

$13.58B

MANU:

$4.02B

EPS

PINS:

$0.50

MANU:

-£0.10

PS Ratio

PINS:

3.29

MANU:

4.41

PB Ratio

PINS:

4.76

MANU:

16.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

PINS:

$4.37B

MANU:

£677.79M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PINS:

$3.49B

MANU:

£169.11M

EBITDA (TTM)

PINS:

$351.59M

MANU:

£216.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINS vs. MANU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINS
PINS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MANU
MANU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MANU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANU Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MANU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINS vs. MANU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Manchester United plc (MANU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINSMANUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.20

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

1.64

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

2.81

-3.85

PINS vs. MANU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the MANU Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINS and MANU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINS vs. MANU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINS drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, which is greater than MANU's maximum drawdown of -58.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINS and MANU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINSMANUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.70%

-58.05%

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.63%

-21.52%

-39.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.72%

-51.39%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.79%

-54.51%

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.07%

-13.19%

-62.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-24.78%

-27.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.41%

12.53%

+22.88%

Volatility

PINS vs. MANU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is 14.98%, while Manchester United plc (MANU) has a volatility of 19.89%. This indicates that PINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MANU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINSMANUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.98%

19.89%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.33%

26.96%

+11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.99%

37.22%

+12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.89%

43.18%

+12.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.18%

37.85%

+23.33%

Dividends

PINS vs. MANU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PINS nor MANU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MANU
Manchester United plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.26%1.08%0.90%0.95%0.91%1.26%0.51%
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PINS vs. MANU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinterest, Inc. and Manchester United plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.01B
189.50M
(PINS) Total Revenue
(MANU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PINS values in USD, MANU values in GBP

PINS vs. MANU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pinterest, Inc. and Manchester United plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
76.3%
100.0%
Portfolio components
PINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a gross profit of 768.96M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

MANU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported a gross profit of 189.50M and revenue of 189.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported an operating income of -80.29M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -8.0%.

MANU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported an operating income of 10.31M and revenue of 189.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

PINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a net income of -73.59M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.

MANU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported a net income of -11.78M and revenue of 189.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PINS and MANU have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MANU has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to PINS (14.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINS dropped -82.70% vs MANU's -58.05%.

MANU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINS and MANU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer