MANU vs. DIS
MANU (Manchester United plc) and DIS (The Walt Disney Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Entertainment industry within the Communication Services sector. Over the past 10 years, MANU returned 2.94%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for DIS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MANU vs. DIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANU achieves a 32.60% return, which is significantly higher than DIS's -12.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MANU has outperformed DIS with an annualized return of 2.94%, while DIS has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.
MANU
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 15.80%
- YTD
- 32.60%
- 6M
- 32.68%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
DIS
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -12.64%
- 6M
- -5.37%
- 1Y
- -11.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- -10.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
MANU vs. DIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANU Manchester United plc | 32.60% | -8.24% | -14.87% | -12.64% | 65.01% | -13.92% | -15.08% | 6.06% | -3.24% | 40.31% |
DIS The Walt Disney Company | -12.64% | 3.30% | 24.44% | 4.26% | -43.91% | -14.51% | 25.27% | 33.51% | 3.61% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANU and DIS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between MANU and DIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MANU:
$3.64B
DIS:
$176.12B
MANU:
-$0.10
DIS:
$6.25
MANU:
5.37
DIS:
1.83
MANU:
20.29
DIS:
1.62
MANU:
$677.79M
DIS:
$97.26B
MANU:
$169.11M
DIS:
$36.14B
MANU:
$216.23M
DIS:
$20.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANU vs. DIS — Risk / Return Rank
MANU
DIS
MANU vs. DIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manchester United plc (MANU) and The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MANU | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.94 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | -0.46 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | -0.96 | +4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MANU | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | -0.48 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.36 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.03 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.34 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
MANU vs. DIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANU drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, smaller than the maximum DIS drawdown of -85.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANU and DIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANU | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -85.66% | +27.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.52% | -24.97% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.39% | -32.86% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.51% | -57.33% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.05% | -60.72% | +2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.35% | -49.62% | +28.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.81% | -26.77% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.53% | 12.05% | +0.48% |
Volatility
MANU vs. DIS - Volatility Comparison
Manchester United plc (MANU) has a higher volatility of 19.37% compared to The Walt Disney Company (DIS) at 9.87%. This indicates that MANU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANU | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.37% | 9.87% | +9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.00% | 19.46% | +6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.96% | 24.32% | +16.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.02% | 29.32% | +13.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.74% | 28.77% | +8.97% |
Dividends
MANU vs. DIS - Dividend Comparison
MANU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS The Walt Disney Company | 1.26% | 1.10% | 0.85% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.22% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 1.30% |
MANU Manchester United plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.26% | 1.08% | 0.90% | 0.95% | 0.91% | 1.26% | 0.51% |
Financials
MANU vs. DIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manchester United plc and The Walt Disney Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MANU vs. DIS - Profitability Comparison
MANU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported a gross profit of 189.50M and revenue of 189.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
DIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Walt Disney Company reported a gross profit of 9.27B and revenue of 25.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
MANU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported an operating income of 10.31M and revenue of 189.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
DIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Walt Disney Company reported an operating income of 4.96B and revenue of 25.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.
MANU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported a net income of -11.78M and revenue of 189.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
DIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Walt Disney Company reported a net income of 2.25B and revenue of 25.17B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MANU and DIS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANU has higher volatility (19.37%) compared to DIS (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANU dropped -58.05% vs DIS's -85.66%.
MANU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MANU and DIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer