MANU vs. EQWL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Manchester United plc (MANU) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL).

EQWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 100 Equal Weighted. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.

Performance

MANU vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manchester United plc (MANU) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MANU vs. EQWL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MANU Manchester United plc	6.72%	-8.24%	-14.87%	-12.64%	65.01%	-13.92%	-15.08%	6.06%	-3.24%	40.31%
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF	-1.85%	17.61%	19.11%	19.48%	-11.46%	28.29%	13.94%	29.54%	-6.30%	24.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANU achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than EQWL's -1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MANU has underperformed EQWL with an annualized return of 2.57%, while EQWL has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.

MANU

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -4.12%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: 29.69%
• 3Y*: -8.46%
• 5Y*: 1.29%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

EQWL

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -5.04%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 14.11%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 13.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MANU vs. EQWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANU

MANU Risk / Return Rank: 66
MANU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MANU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MANU Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MANU Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MANU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EQWL

EQWL Risk / Return Rank: 48
EQWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
EQWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EQWL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
EQWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EQWL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANU vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manchester United plc (MANU) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MANU	EQWL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	0.88	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.32	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.20	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	1.21	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.42	5.55	-3.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MANU vs. EQWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANU Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the EQWL Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANU and EQWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MANU	EQWL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	0.88	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.74	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.81	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.56	-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between MANU and EQWL is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MANU vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison

MANU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MANU Manchester United plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.26%	1.08%	0.90%	0.95%	0.91%	1.26%	0.51%
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF	1.70%	1.67%	1.86%	1.97%	2.12%	1.65%	2.01%	2.04%	2.23%	1.27%	2.01%	2.03%

Drawdowns

MANU vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANU drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than EQWL's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANU and EQWL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MANU	EQWL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.05%	-49.36%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.52%	-11.47%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.51%	-22.99%	-31.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.05%	-34.30%	-23.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.70%	-5.51%	-31.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.74%	-6.75%	-17.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.30%	2.51%	+9.79%

Volatility

MANU vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison

Manchester United plc (MANU) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) at 4.15%. This indicates that MANU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MANU	EQWL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.07%	4.15%	+3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.47%	7.86%	+12.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.20%	16.12%	+22.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.34%	14.98%	+27.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.39%	16.78%	+20.61%