PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINK vs. SDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PINK vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PINK vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
-7.89%24.34%8.81%3.80%-4.41%12.20%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
6.70%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%-5.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a -7.89% return, which is significantly lower than SDIV's 6.70% return.


PINK

1D
3.63%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
-7.89%
6M
6.60%
1Y
15.70%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
10Y*

SDIV

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
6.70%
6M
10.37%
1Y
32.97%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
0.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PINK vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PINK vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINKSDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

2.07

-1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

2.66

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.41

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

2.43

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.29

12.21

-8.91

PINK vs. SDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and SDIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINKSDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.07

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.06

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and SDIV is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PINK vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SDIV's 9.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.74%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.10%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Drawdowns

PINK vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and SDIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PINKSDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-56.90%

+38.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-13.37%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.60%

-17.21%

+4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-18.63%

+11.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

2.66%

+2.14%

Volatility

PINK vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) at 6.25%. This indicates that PINK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PINKSDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

6.25%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

9.21%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

16.03%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.79%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

18.96%

-1.38%