PINK vs. SDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) and SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PINK is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. PINK is actively managed, while SDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PINK returned 14.42%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for SDIV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PINK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SDIV.

Performance

PINK vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than SDIV's 5.97% return.

PINK

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SDIV

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 6.19%
• 1Y: 25.09%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: -0.84%
• 10Y*: -0.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINK vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	2.39%	24.34%	8.81%	3.80%	-4.41%	12.20%
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	5.97%	29.12%	1.77%	5.46%	-26.43%	-5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and SDIV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2021	0.49

PINK vs. SDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PINK	SDIV
Healthcare	93.1%	1.4%
Industrials	6.9%	14.3%
Financial Services	0.0%	8.9%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Communication Services	-	6.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Energy	-	18.4%
Real Estate	-	36.2%
Technology	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

PINK vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK

PINK Risk / Return Rank: 44
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

SDIV

SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 61
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINK	SDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.02	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.73	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.35	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	3.43	-1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.62	12.41	-6.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PINK vs. SDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and SDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINK	SDIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.02	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.06	+0.50

Drawdowns

PINK vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and SDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINK	SDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-56.90%	+38.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.81%	-7.35%	-9.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.77%	-18.64%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-17.77%	+14.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.75%	-18.59%	+11.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.57%	2.03%	+3.54%

Volatility

PINK vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINK	SDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	4.21%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	9.64%	+3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.17%	12.47%	+5.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	16.86%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.57%	18.97%	-1.40%

PINK vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PINK vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SDIV's 10.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	0.67%	0.68%	0.32%	0.94%	0.42%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	10.02%	9.59%	11.33%	11.73%	14.17%	8.95%	7.96%	8.73%	9.22%	6.66%	6.95%	7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PINK and SDIV in my portfolio?

PINK and SDIV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PINK or SDIV?

PINK has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SDIV (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINK dropped -18.77% vs SDIV's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, PINK or SDIV?

On 3-year performance, SDIV leads with 15.75% vs 14.42% for PINK. On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PINK or SDIV?

Over the 3-year period, SDIV has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PINK or SDIV?

PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PINK or SDIV?

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.

What is the main difference between PINK and SDIV?

PINK is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SDIV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PINK and 0.58% for SDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.