PINK vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PINK is actively managed, while CNCR is passively managed. PINK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

PINK vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PINK

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINK vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	3.10%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

PINK vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PINK	CNCR
Healthcare	93.1%	96.6%
Industrials	6.9%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	3.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PINK vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK

PINK Risk / Return Rank: 44
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINK	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINK	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	—	—

Drawdowns

PINK vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINK	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	0.00%	-18.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	0.00%	-2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.75%	0.00%	-6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PINK	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.17%	0.00%	+18.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	0.00%	+17.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.57%	0.00%	+17.57%

PINK vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PINK vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	0.67%	0.68%	0.32%	0.94%	0.42%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PINK or CNCR?

On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PINK or CNCR?

PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PINK or CNCR?

PINK has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between PINK and CNCR?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PINK and 0.79% for CNCR.