PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINCX vs. PNOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINCX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than PNOPX's 4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PINCX has underperformed PNOPX with an annualized return of 2.05%, while PNOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.


PINCX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.88%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
2.05%

PNOPX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.62%
YTD
4.81%
6M
4.07%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PINCX
Putnam Income Fund
0.92%7.51%2.59%4.79%-12.96%-5.39%7.06%11.19%0.46%5.83%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
4.81%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%28.57%35.86%-0.90%29.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PINCX and PNOPX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1991

-0.01

The correlation between PINCX and PNOPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINCX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINCX
PINCX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINCXPNOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.55

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

5.79

+2.08

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PNOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINCX and PNOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINCXPNOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.64

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.54

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.83

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.55

+0.21

Drawdowns

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINCX drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINCX and PNOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINCXPNOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.57%

-74.15%

+43.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.40%

-13.06%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.73%

-22.90%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

-29.13%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.16%

-30.29%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.95%

0.00%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-24.03%

+19.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

3.48%

-2.70%

Volatility

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) is 1.38%, while Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that PINCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINCXPNOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

3.26%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

9.44%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

12.28%

-8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

17.36%

-11.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

18.15%

-12.87%

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINCX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINCX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison

PINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than PNOPX's 10.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PINCX
Putnam Income Fund
4.55%4.63%8.70%7.35%7.70%2.15%5.46%4.65%3.57%3.46%3.21%3.03%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
10.70%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINCX and PNOPX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNOPX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to PINCX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINCX dropped -30.57% vs PNOPX's -74.15%.

PNOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINCX and PNOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer