PINCX vs. MCFIX
PINCX (Putnam Income Fund) and MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PINCX returned -0.56%/yr vs -0.73%/yr for MCFIX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PINCX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MCFIX.
Performance
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PINCX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -2.44% return.
PINCX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.96%
MCFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- 0.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
PINCX Putnam Income Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINCX Putnam Income Fund | 0.09% | 7.51% | 2.59% | 4.79% | -12.96% | -5.39% | 7.06% | 7.34% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -2.44% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PINCX and MCFIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PINCX and MCFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PINCX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
PINCX
MCFIX
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PINCX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.00 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 0.01 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 0.02 | +4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PINCX drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than MCFIX's maximum drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINCX and MCFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PINCX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.57% | -21.68% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -4.08% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.08% | -5.27% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -18.72% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -7.35% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -8.49% | +4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 1.72% | -0.85% |
Volatility
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Income Fund (PINCX) is 0.82%, while Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that PINCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PINCX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 1.03% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 2.93% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 4.01% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 6.05% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 6.07% | -0.79% |
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PINCX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
PINCX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison
PINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than MCFIX's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.37% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PINCX Putnam Income Fund | 4.58% | 4.63% | 8.70% | 7.35% | 7.70% | 2.15% | 5.46% | 4.65% | 3.57% | 3.46% | 3.21% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PINCX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCFIX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to PINCX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINCX dropped -30.57% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.
PINCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PINCX and MCFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer