PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PINC.TO charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CNQE.TO.

Performance

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINC.TO achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 38.89% return.

PINC.TO

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 17.22%
• YTD: 18.40%
• 1Y: 24.52%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.09%

CNQE.TO

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 20.49%
• 6M: 30.71%
• YTD: 38.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	CA$83.57K	CA$141.08K	CA$120.49K
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	CA$10.04K	CA$9.73K	CA$12.47K

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	18.40%	4.23%
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	38.89%	15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PINC.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINC.TO

PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CNQE.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PINC.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.66	—	—

Drawdowns

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINC.TO and CNQE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINC.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.84%	-22.31%	-21.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.39%	+6.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-5.77%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PINC.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.35%	33.59%	-27.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.38%	33.59%	-25.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.70%	33.59%	-18.89%

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINC.TO has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than CNQE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PINC.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

PINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than CNQE.TO's 11.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	11.09%	4.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	4.37%	5.05%	5.48%	5.78%	5.51%	4.60%	5.33%	5.06%	3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PINC.TO and CNQE.TO in my portfolio?

PINC.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PINC.TO or CNQE.TO?

On fees, CNQE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PINC.TO or CNQE.TO?

CNQE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PINC.TO.

What is the main difference between PINC.TO and CNQE.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PINC.TO and 0.40% for CNQE.TO.