CNQE.TO vs. EASY.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and EASY.TO (Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

CNQE.TO vs. EASY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF (EASY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNQE.TO

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 36.84%
• 6M: 36.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EASY.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQE.TO vs. EASY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	-3.04%
EASY.TO Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF	7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQE.TO and EASY.TO is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026	-0.40

Return for Risk

CNQE.TO vs. EASY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF (EASY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNQE.TO	EASY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.37	1.76	+0.61

Drawdowns

CNQE.TO vs. EASY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, which is greater than EASY.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQE.TO and EASY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNQE.TO	EASY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.22%	-8.20%	-10.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.77%	-2.25%	-5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-1.96%	-2.15%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNQE.TO	EASY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.16%	22.06%	+11.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.16%	22.06%	+11.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.16%	22.06%	+11.10%

Dividends

CNQE.TO vs. EASY.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNQE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, more than EASY.TO's 6.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	9.57%	4.42%
EASY.TO Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF	6.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNQE.TO and EASY.TO in my portfolio?

CNQE.TO and EASY.TO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between CNQE.TO and EASY.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Evolve.