PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINC.TO achieves a 13.46% return, which is significantly higher than PDIV.TO's 7.12% return.


PINC.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.46%
YTD
13.46%
6M
14.63%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*

PDIV.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.70%
YTD
7.12%
6M
7.91%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
13.46%14.41%17.01%5.89%-8.44%26.14%2.90%14.28%-6.43%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
7.12%15.82%10.71%4.64%-4.40%20.18%-1.15%23.57%-6.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PINC.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2018

0.34

The correlation between PINC.TO and PDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PINC.TO
PDIV.TO

Financial Services

28.9%
31.6%

Energy

22.1%
18.2%

Real Estate

21.3%

-

Utilities

17.4%
4.5%

Communication Services

6.0%
4.0%

Healthcare

1.3%
6.5%

Industrials

0.9%
5.9%

Basic Materials

0.8%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.9%

Technology

0.3%
12.6%

Financial Services

PINC.TO
28.9%
PDIV.TO
31.6%

Energy

PINC.TO
22.1%
PDIV.TO
18.2%

Real Estate

PINC.TO
21.3%
PDIV.TO

-

Utilities

PINC.TO
17.4%
PDIV.TO
4.5%

Communication Services

PINC.TO
6.0%
PDIV.TO
4.0%

Healthcare

PINC.TO
1.3%
PDIV.TO
6.5%

Industrials

PINC.TO
0.9%
PDIV.TO
5.9%

Basic Materials

PINC.TO
0.8%
PDIV.TO
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PINC.TO
0.7%
PDIV.TO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

PINC.TO
0.5%
PDIV.TO
3.9%

Technology

PINC.TO
0.3%
PDIV.TO
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINC.TO
PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINC.TOPDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.56

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

3.62

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.84

15.98

+8.86

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is comparable to the PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINC.TO and PDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINC.TOPDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

2.78

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.82

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.62

0.00

Drawdowns

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than PDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINC.TO and PDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINC.TOPDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.84%

-30.64%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.59%

-5.22%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.38%

-8.61%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.59%

-14.96%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.27%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.35%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.18%

-0.25%

Volatility

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) is 1.92%, while Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that PINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINC.TOPDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

2.43%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

5.36%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.48%

6.79%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.58%

9.87%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

13.89%

+1.02%

Dividends

PINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

PINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than PDIV.TO's 11.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
11.85%12.24%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
4.54%5.05%10.05%10.60%9.99%8.17%7.34%5.06%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINC.TO and PDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINC.TO and PDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer