CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO
CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. CNQE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GLCC.TO.
Performance
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQE.TO achieves a 38.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's 16.02% return.
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 38.03%
- 6M
- 46.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 16.02%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 95.00%
- 3Y*
- 44.84%
- 5Y*
- 26.22%
- 10Y*
- 17.74%
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 38.03% | 13.80% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 16.02% | 38.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQE.TO and GLCC.TO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management — when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNQE.TO
GLCC.TO
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNQE.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.39 | 0.20 | +3.19 |
Drawdowns
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQE.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.39%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQE.TO and GLCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQE.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -71.12% | +58.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -10.76% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -34.57% | +31.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNQE.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.20% | 40.19% | -8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.20% | 31.23% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.20% | 31.78% | -0.58% |
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNQE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNQE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNQE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, which matches GLCC.TO's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 6.52% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 6.48% | 6.01% | 10.30% | 11.16% | 10.08% | 6.31% | 6.47% | 4.58% | 5.62% | 7.09% | 9.21% | 11.65% |