PILL vs. TERG
PILL (Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PILL is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PILL charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
PILL vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PILL achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 225.36% return.
PILL
- 1D
- 8.24%
- 1M
- -11.70%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 123.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- -10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 225.36%
- 6M
- 202.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PILL vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PILL Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares | -1.69% | 27.52% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 225.36% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PILL and TERG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PILL vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
PILL
TERG
PILL vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PILL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PILL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 9.47 | -9.58 |
Drawdowns
PILL vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PILL drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PILL and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PILL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.76% | -49.52% | -39.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.31% | -17.07% | -49.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.54% | -13.75% | -44.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | — | — |
Volatility
PILL vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PILL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.21% | 138.78% | -76.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.53% | 138.78% | -78.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.83% | 138.78% | -74.95% |
PILL vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PILL has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PILL vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
PILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PILL Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares | 0.64% | 0.69% | 1.28% | 1.83% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.91% | 0.10% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PILL and TERG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PILL.
PILL has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PILL and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for PILL and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer