PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIGI.L vs. KROG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PIGI.L is traded in GBp, while KROG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the KROG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGI.L achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 15.55% return.


PIGI.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.12%
YTD
6.14%
6M
6.47%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KROG.L

1D
0.42%
1M
0.42%
YTD
15.55%
6M
13.48%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
-1.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PIGI.L and KROG.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGI.L
PIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

KROG.L
KROG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KROG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIGI.LKROG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.15

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.52

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

3.05

+5.75

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIGI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the KROG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIGI.L and KROG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIGI.LKROG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.80

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

-0.45

+2.54

Drawdowns

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum KROG.L drawdown of -51.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGI.L and KROG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIGI.LKROG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-51.38%

+45.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-8.21%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-38.55%

+38.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-34.39%

+33.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

4.12%

-2.31%

Volatility

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) is 1.33%, while Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that PIGI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIGI.LKROG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

5.64%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

12.21%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.36%

15.69%

-7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

19.47%

-11.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.46%

19.47%

-11.01%

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIGI.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIGI.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PIGI.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PIGI.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KROG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KROG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PIGI.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for PIGI.L and 0.50% for KROG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIGI.L and KROG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer