PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

PIGI.L is traded in GBp, while SHLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SHLG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGI.L achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than SHLG.L's -2.44% return.


PIGI.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
1.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHLG.L

1D
3.31%
1M
1.48%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-3.87%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIGI.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGI.L

SHLG.L
SHLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SHLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIGI.LSHLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.42

+1.05

Correlation

The correlation between PIGI.L and SHLG.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Dividend Comparison

PIGI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


TTM20252024202320222021
PIGI.L
HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHLG.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.54%0.53%0.60%0.55%0.76%0.89%

Drawdowns

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum SHLG.L drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGI.L and SHLG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PIGI.LSHLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-26.91%

+20.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-8.12%

+3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-9.63%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

Volatility

PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PIGI.LSHLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

19.88%

-11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.81%

18.60%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.81%

18.58%

-9.77%