PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L).
PIGI.L and SHLG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PIGI.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 8, 2020. SHLG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 29, 2018. Both PIGI.L and SHLG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIGI.L HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF | -0.59% | 12.66% |
SHLG.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -2.44% | 16.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
PIGI.L is traded in GBp, while SHLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SHLG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIGI.L achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than SHLG.L's -2.44% return.
PIGI.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLG.L
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIGI.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
PIGI.L
SHLG.L
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIGI.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.42 | +1.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between PIGI.L and SHLG.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Dividend Comparison
PIGI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGI.L HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLG.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.55% | 0.76% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum SHLG.L drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGI.L and SHLG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIGI.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -26.91% | +20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -8.12% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -9.63% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.27% | — |
Volatility
PIGI.L vs. SHLG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PIGI.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 19.88% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.81% | 18.60% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.81% | 18.58% | -9.77% |