PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIEQ vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIEQ vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIEQ achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 38.94% return.


PIEQ

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.25%
6M
5.01%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.17%

GSG

1D
0.28%
1M
12.94%
6M
25.75%
YTD
38.94%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
-2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.60M$17.31M$26.52M
$1.59M$1.39M$4.05M

PIEQ vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PIEQ
Principal International Equity ETF
10.07%38.10%-2.98%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
38.94%5.93%1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PIEQ and GSG is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIEQ vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIEQ
PIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIEQ vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEQGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.16

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

6.99

+3.23

PIEQ vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIEQ and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIEQ vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIEQ drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEQ and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEQGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-89.62%

+74.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-18.81%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-58.05%

+57.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-63.67%

+61.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

5.84%

-3.24%

Volatility

PIEQ vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) is 4.74%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that PIEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEQGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

8.11%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.19%

22.18%

-6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

24.23%

-6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

22.86%

-5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

22.06%

-4.37%

PIEQ vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIEQ vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

PIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIEQ
Principal International Equity ETF
1.17%1.28%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIEQ and GSG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to PIEQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIEQ dropped -15.17% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 42.34% vs 27.27% for PIEQ. On fees, PIEQ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, PIEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 42.34% return vs 27.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PIEQ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

PIEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

PIEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for PIEQ and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIEQ and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer