PICK vs. RBIL
PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PICK returned 67.77% vs 3.81% for RBIL. Their -0.18 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PICK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
PICK vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.61% return.
PICK
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 1Y
- 67.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.59%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.18M | $46.26M | $52.13M | |
| $1.19M | $1.87M | $2.26M |
PICK vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 24.23% | 45.13% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.61% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PICK and RBIL is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PICK vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
PICK
RBIL
PICK vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PICK | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 2.00 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 6.80 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.37 | 27.52 | -18.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PICK vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PICK | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.87% | -0.56% | -68.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -0.56% | -18.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.47% | -0.22% | -7.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -0.08% | -23.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | 0.14% | +7.11% |
Volatility
PICK vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PICK | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 0.28% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.03% | 0.89% | +25.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 0.96% | +29.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.18% | 1.06% | +27.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 1.06% | +27.27% |
PICK vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
PICK vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.08% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PICK and RBIL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, PICK leads with 67.77% vs 3.81% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PICK has performed better with a 67.77% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.08% for PICK.
PICK is categorized as Metals, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PICK and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer