PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PICK vs. MXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PICK vs. MXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than MXI's 17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PICK has outperformed MXI with an annualized return of 17.67%, while MXI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.


PICK

1D
-2.74%
1M
11.27%
YTD
30.58%
6M
38.84%
1Y
88.13%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
17.67%

MXI

1D
-0.94%
1M
5.12%
YTD
17.06%
6M
21.02%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICK vs. MXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
30.58%51.89%-16.37%9.69%2.54%22.61%27.46%16.47%-18.65%38.42%
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
17.06%27.43%-8.25%14.37%-9.09%15.06%22.31%22.19%-16.06%30.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PICK and MXI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.87

The correlation between PICK and MXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PICK vs. MXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PICK
MXI

Basic Materials

96.6%
95.2%

Industrials

1.1%
0.4%

Technology

1.0%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

PICK
96.6%
MXI
95.2%

Industrials

PICK
1.1%
MXI
0.4%

Technology

PICK
1.0%
MXI

-

Energy

PICK
0.6%
MXI

-

Consumer Defensive

PICK
0.1%
MXI
0.6%

Financial Services

PICK
0.1%
MXI

-

Communication Services

PICK

-

MXI

-

Consumer Cyclical

PICK

-

MXI
4.4%

Healthcare

PICK

-

MXI

-

Real Estate

PICK

-

MXI

-

Utilities

PICK

-

MXI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PICK vs. MXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MXI
MXI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICK vs. MXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PICKMXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.32

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

2.19

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

8.85

+9.35

PICK vs. MXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICK Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the MXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICK and MXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PICKMXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

1.83

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.34

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.26

-0.05

Drawdowns

PICK vs. MXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, roughly equal to the maximum MXI drawdown of -68.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and MXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PICKMXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-68.44%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-16.18%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.52%

-22.25%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

-28.76%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.72%

-39.52%

-13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-2.92%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-18.07%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

4.00%

+0.86%

Volatility

PICK vs. MXI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) at 7.26%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PICKMXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.99%

7.26%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.11%

16.51%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.10%

19.44%

+8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.78%

19.67%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.37%

20.43%

+7.94%

PICK vs. MXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MXI's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PICK vs. MXI - Dividend Comparison

PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than MXI's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
1.90%2.22%3.24%2.92%4.84%3.51%1.21%3.64%2.77%1.76%1.31%3.64%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.20%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


PICK and MXI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PICK has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to MXI (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs MXI's -68.44%.

On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.67% vs 11.53% for MXI. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.90% for MXI.

PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.46% for MXI.

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PICK and MXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer