PICK vs. MXI
PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) and MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) are both Materials funds from iShares - PICK tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index while MXI tracks the S&P Global Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PICK returned 17.67%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for MXI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PICK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MXI.
Performance
PICK vs. MXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than MXI's 17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PICK has outperformed MXI with an annualized return of 17.67%, while MXI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.
PICK
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 30.58%
- 6M
- 38.84%
- 1Y
- 88.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.67%
MXI
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 35.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
PICK vs. MXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 30.58% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 17.06% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PICK and MXI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PICK and MXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PICK vs. MXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PICK
MXI
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
PICK
MXI
Industrials
PICK
MXI
Technology
PICK
MXI
-
Energy
PICK
MXI
-
Consumer Defensive
PICK
MXI
Financial Services
PICK
MXI
-
Communication Services
PICK
-
MXI
-
Consumer Cyclical
PICK
-
MXI
Healthcare
PICK
-
MXI
-
Real Estate
PICK
-
MXI
-
Utilities
PICK
-
MXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PICK vs. MXI — Risk / Return Rank
PICK
MXI
PICK vs. MXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PICK | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.32 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 2.19 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.20 | 8.85 | +9.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PICK | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | 1.83 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.34 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.26 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
PICK vs. MXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, roughly equal to the maximum MXI drawdown of -68.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and MXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PICK | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.87% | -68.44% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -16.18% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.52% | -22.25% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | -28.76% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.72% | -39.52% | -13.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -2.92% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.12% | -18.07% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 4.00% | +0.86% |
Volatility
PICK vs. MXI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) at 7.26%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PICK | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.99% | 7.26% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | 16.51% | +7.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.10% | 19.44% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.78% | 19.67% | +8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 20.43% | +7.94% |
PICK vs. MXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PICK vs. MXI - Dividend Comparison
PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than MXI's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.90% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.20% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PICK and MXI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to MXI (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs MXI's -68.44%.
On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.67% vs 11.53% for MXI. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.90% for MXI.
PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.46% for MXI.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PICK and MXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer