PICK vs. METL
PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PICK is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. PICK is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PICK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
PICK vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 18.34% return.
PICK
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 30.58%
- 6M
- 38.84%
- 1Y
- 88.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.67%
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PICK vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 30.58% | 25.16% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PICK and METL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PICK vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
PICK
METL
PICK vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PICK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.16 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.63 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PICK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.72 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
PICK vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PICK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.87% | -27.39% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -10.27% | +7.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.12% | -8.11% | -16.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | — | — |
Volatility
PICK vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PICK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.10% | 43.94% | -15.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.78% | 43.94% | -16.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 43.94% | -15.57% |
PICK vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
PICK vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than METL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.20% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PICK and METL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
PICK is categorized as Materials, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for PICK and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer