PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PICK vs. METL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PICK vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 18.34% return.


PICK

1D
-2.74%
1M
11.27%
YTD
30.58%
6M
38.84%
1Y
88.13%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
17.67%

METL

1D
-3.81%
1M
5.71%
YTD
18.34%
6M
25.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICK vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PICK and METL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PICK vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

METL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICK vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PICKMETLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.20

PICK vs. METL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PICKMETLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.72

-1.51

Drawdowns

PICK vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and METL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PICKMETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-27.39%

-41.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-10.27%

+7.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-8.11%

-16.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

Volatility

PICK vs. METL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PICKMETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.10%

43.94%

-15.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.78%

43.94%

-16.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.37%

43.94%

-15.57%

PICK vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PICK vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than METL's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METL
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
0.84%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.20%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


PICK and METL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.84% for METL.

PICK is categorized as Materials, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.89% for METL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PICK and METL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer