PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PICK vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PICK vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PICK has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 17.67%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.30% annualized return.


PICK

1D
-2.74%
1M
11.27%
YTD
30.58%
6M
38.84%
1Y
88.13%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
17.67%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICK vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
30.58%51.89%-16.37%9.69%2.54%22.61%27.46%16.47%-18.65%38.42%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PICK and DGRO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.60

The correlation between PICK and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

PICK vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PICK
DGRO

Basic Materials

96.6%
2.5%

Industrials

1.1%
10.8%

Technology

1.0%
19.4%

Energy

0.6%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
11.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
21.2%

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.7%

Healthcare

-

16.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.9%

Basic Materials

PICK
96.6%
DGRO
2.5%

Industrials

PICK
1.1%
DGRO
10.8%

Technology

PICK
1.0%
DGRO
19.4%

Energy

PICK
0.6%
DGRO
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

PICK
0.1%
DGRO
11.5%

Financial Services

PICK
0.1%
DGRO
21.2%

Communication Services

PICK

-

DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PICK

-

DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

PICK

-

DGRO
16.4%

Real Estate

PICK

-

DGRO

-

Utilities

PICK

-

DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PICK vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICK vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PICKDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

3.50

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

13.52

+4.68

PICK vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICK Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICK and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PICKDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.39

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.77

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.80

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.76

-0.55

Drawdowns

PICK vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PICKDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-35.10%

-33.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-6.47%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.52%

-14.03%

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

-19.31%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.72%

-35.10%

-17.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-0.28%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-3.44%

-20.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

1.67%

+3.19%

Volatility

PICK vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PICKDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.99%

2.21%

+8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.11%

6.91%

+17.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.10%

9.48%

+18.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.78%

13.82%

+13.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.37%

16.62%

+11.75%

PICK vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PICK vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.20%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


PICK and DGRO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PICK has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.67% vs 13.30% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

PICK is categorized as Materials, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.08% for DGRO.

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PICK and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer